Paper Residential Community Governance 2026-04-15 MEMBER CONTENT

The 50-State Managing-Agent Licensure Gap

A state-by-state comparison of licensure, bonding, and disciplinary authority over condominium and cooperative managing agents. Primary-source survey of all 50 states plus DC.

By TASFGA Research

The 50-State Managing-Agent Licensure Gap

Working paper — draft in progress

Abstract

A barber in New York State must hold a license. The firm managing a $200M residential building and a $15M annual budget does not. This paper surveys all 50 states and the District of Columbia to document the regulatory framework (or absence thereof) governing condominium and cooperative managing agents — the firms that exercise day-to-day financial and operational control over the buildings where, per the Foundation for Community Association Research, more than 75 million Americans live.

Key findings (preliminary)

The full state-by-state grid is in progress; final counts will be published with the completed survey. The anchor findings already verified against primary sources:

  • Florida licenses community association managers (Fla. Stat. ch. 468, pt. VIII) — exam, continuing education, and a disciplinary arm within the Department of Business and Professional Regulation.
  • Nevada requires a community-manager certificate (NRS ch. 116A) with an enforcement commission that has revoked credentials.
  • Virginia regulates management firms through its Common Interest Community Board (established 2008).
  • California imposes a certification-and-disclosure regime on common-interest-development managers (Bus. & Prof. Code §§11500–11506).
  • New York requires none of this. No license, no exam, no bond, no continuing education, no disciplinary body, and no public complaint registry for residential managing agents.

Methodology

Each state is surveyed against a uniform rubric: (1) Is a license required? (2) What exam or education is prerequisite? (3) Is a bond or insurance mandate in place? (4) Is there a public complaint registry? (5) Is there a disciplinary body with enforcement power? (6) Are there continuing-education requirements? (7) What are the penalties for unlicensed practice?

Sources are exclusively primary: state statutes, administrative codes, licensing-board websites, and FOIA/FOIL productions where necessary.

Why this matters

The managing-agent industry oversees a large volume of residential common charges and assessments nationwide. Where licensure requirements are absent, the legislative record in several states shows repeated managing-agent or community-association licensure bills that did not advance; this paper aims to document those histories against primary sources rather than assert a single cause.

Status

Research is in progress. Publication target: Q3 2026. Partial state surveys will be made available to members in the research library as they are completed, once membership opens.


Working paper. Findings are preliminary and subject to revision through peer review.

Member content.

This paper will be available to TASFGA members. Membership is planned (illustrative pricing from $75/year) and is not yet open; it would include the full research library, Monthly Governance Brief, and free quick lookups.